Pro Series needs to Incorporate E-filing of PA Local EIT returns as part of the Protocol e-filing Federal and PA state tax returns. The fact that we tax pros need to have a SEPARATE PAPER FILING system is inefficient and NOT cost effective for continued use of the PS Software when there are other software companies on the market that have successfully implemented this feature.
For the past several years since Tax Advisory was introduced in ProConnect, despite all the requests we have submitted to have this option added to ProSeries, there has been no response or acknowledgement. In my opinion, Intuit could offer three types of ProSeries: 1) Basic, 2) Professional, and 3) Advisory Professional, each with three different pricing tiers.
I'd like to see a way to force Lacerte to put monthly totals on Form 8962 instead of having it report annual totals when 12 month detail is entered. I have a client where not all columns are the same for 12 months on Form 1095-A, but Lacerte is totaling all columns as if they are and putting them on line 10. My support agent was super helpful but we discovered that there is not a way to make this change.
my client had a 61K loss yet the program insisted on showing the 2012 - 2017 NOL's. Negative one didnt work as an override as it did in 2018 - 2024
The MFJ vs MFS comparison should include the analysis at the state level as well; ProConnect only provides it at the federal level! My practice is based in NJ, and so we have many NJ and NY taxpayers. The benefit of filing MFS actually occurs at the state level for taxpayers earning more than 7 figures. But since the MFJ vs MFS comparison does not provide it at the state level, it is extremely time consuming to perform this analysis manually. I used Drake for many years which always provided the MFJ vs MFS comparative analysis at the state level as well. I feel this should be obvious and standard for ProConnect to provide. I cannot figure a reason why it would not be made available.
Hi,It would be great if there was a log somewhere that showed me when I had sent a client their return through the Intuit Link. It would be great if those PDFs saved somewhere so when they request another copy it's the date from when I sent it last time and not today's date.I forget who I've sent returns to and either I end up sending them seven times or not at all because I can't tell what I have or haven't sent. This makes me look unprofessional.
RDP couples residing together in community property states, like CA, must file separate federal returns as single individuals, and their separate federal returns should include community property allocations, as detailed on Form 8958. However, as many prior posters have pointed out, Form 8958 in ProSeries is informational and does not change any calculation on the federal return.To accurately reflect the community property allocations on each federal return, some preparers enter half of each partner's community amounts on each return, but this can result in IRS mismatch notices. Accordingly, some preparers enter aggregate adjustments for income, deductions, withholding, and credits (e.g., an aggregate income adjustment is entered on Schedule 1, Line 1z on both federal returns). This potentially resolves the mismatch notices, but aggregate adjustments may not yield accurate calculations overall (e.g., qualified dividends are taxed differently than ordinary dividends). Additionally, certain negative adjustments result in e-file rejections from the software (e.g., a negative withholding adjustment on Form 1040, Line 25c results in an e-file rejection).Ideally, ProSeries should support entering community property allocations independent of the info from each partner's underlying tax forms. This would help ensure the accuracy of the federal returns while preventing IRS mismatch notices and e-file rejections from the software.
I've always wanted to add an unreasonable request for a program feature that will be the last step in removing the human element from the return preparation process. I think I have found one. I was working on a return with a Schedule C, and a taxpayer who qualifies for the deduction for self-employed health insurance. But when I entered it, the refund decreased. Took me a few minutes to figure it out. They had enough medical to claim the excess over 7.5%, and to itemize. So, they get the $5,000 deduction for health insurance in any case. But claiming it as SEHI, lowers their QBI by $1,000. Intuit should have warned me not to do it. And of course, then Intuit should have first figured out whether lower AGI would prevent higher Medicare premiums next year. Or reduce the $6K/$12K senior deduction.
© 2026 Intuit Inc. All rights reserved.
Intuit, QuickBooks, QB, TurboTax, ProConnect, Credit Karma, and Mailchimp are registered trademarks of Intuit Inc. Terms and conditions, features, support, pricing, and service options subject to change without notice.
By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
© 2026 Intuit Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Intuit et QuickBooks sont des marques déposées d’Intuit, Inc. Les modalités, les fonctions, le soutien, les prix et les options de service peuvent être modifiés sans préavis.
By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.