Build better products with our product team
I would love to have the option to set up automatic payments for Massachusetts quarterly estimated taxes for my clients. Similar to the feature Lacerte already has for Federal estimated payments.Please VOTE yes for this idea!!! Thank you! 🙂
Many (over a dozen) clients have received letters from CO. The issue is that the 4th quarter estimates, paid in January 2026 are being applied to 2026 estimates instead. Can this be corrected?
Hello,California and a few other states support e-filing superseded returns. California specifically added support for Individual/Fiduciary in 2022, joining the business entities which they had supported previously.Unfortunately, Lacerte has not added support to supersede state returns yet. Many other competing tax software programs have this feature and have for some time.While it is great to supersede a Federal return, having to amend the California return makes the process convoluted and we believe it is time Lacerte catches up and adds support to supersede the state as well.Thanks for listening.
Hello Pro Series,I have an idea on how to help many Michigan tax preparers file returns with the new computer program that the state of Michigan has implemented on reviewing returns this year. Michigan is focusing on tax returns that have a retirement plan distribution with a 4 code to see if it is from a deceased spouse.The state of Michigan allows you to deduct retirement plan distributions from your taxable income. The only retirement distributions that are not deductible are ones with a code 4 on them that are not from a deceased spouse. An example of a non deductible retirement plan death distribution that is not deductible is one from a parent or from a friend. There should be an error message that takes you to a screen where you can put in the deceased spouses information if it applies. If the deduction is not allowable then you would put another code in that tells the system that your death distribution is a non deductible retirement plan distribution.What do the rest of you Michigan tax preparers think of this idea.Thanks,John Skouberdis
I have several taxpayers with dependents who alternate between divorced parents based on odd and even years. There should be a way to suspend a dependent from being included in the current year without being required to delete them and reentering the info the next year. Also, the odd or even option should be part of the error checking like the banking info. I should be prompted to confirm if a dependent is eligible based on the divorce decree. There should be a flag on each to retain the odd or even information.
My problem is the 1040 had a refund and the state had a balance due. There should be separate selections for each and rather than in the info page it should be on the final portion of the tax return where you have the option of applying a refund to a future period. At that point all the banking info is available and selecting an option (apply-refund-pay) would be mutually exclusive within the tax return and each tax return could have an independent choice.
© 2026 Intuit Inc. All rights reserved.
Intuit, QuickBooks, QB, TurboTax, ProConnect, Credit Karma, and Mailchimp are registered trademarks of Intuit Inc. Terms and conditions, features, support, pricing, and service options subject to change without notice.
By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
© 2026 Intuit Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Intuit et QuickBooks sont des marques déposées d’Intuit, Inc. Les modalités, les fonctions, le soutien, les prix et les options de service peuvent être modifiés sans préavis.
By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK