Skip to main content
Level 2
October 12, 2021
Question

Do I really need a "host" install? Using NAS for shared file directory instead?

  • October 12, 2021
  • 2 replies
  • 24 views

Our resources are pushing it with 3 vm's running on a Windows Server and I'd really like to use a bare-metal hypervisor instead where the 3 vm's are all that are using the system resources. Do I really need a machine dedicated as the Lacerte host (a full installation) or can I just edit each Lacerte instance on the vm's to use a directory on my NAS for accessing the client files, etc. directories? Thank you.

This topic has been closed for replies.

2 replies

qbteachmt
Level 15
October 12, 2021
Level 2
October 12, 2021

Appreciate the links but those don't really answer it. A Windows host shouldn't make a difference as far as I know since Lacerte isn't running on it in conjunction with the hosts - it just sits there. Essentially it's acting as a file/folder share. Is there something I'm missing?

qbteachmt
Level 15
October 12, 2021

"A Windows host shouldn't make a difference"

There is no Host, for NAS. That's why you can attach it physically to your Router.

The issue for NAS is "nonmanaged." The links I provided included other links.

"Lacerte isn't running on it in conjunction with the hosts"

For these types of programs and/or files, you want an installation that is also Managed, to avoid conflicts. NAS = indiscriminating library shelving.

"it just sits there."

Exactly.

"Essentially it's acting as a file/folder share. Is there something I'm missing?"

Not you. Your System is missing that there needs to be some management. This is a known issue for how NAS functions. It is part of the intent for creating and the basis for using NAS.

 

Don't yell at us; we're volunteers
qbteachmt
Level 15
October 16, 2021