Welcome back! Ask questions, get answers, and join our large community of tax professionals.
  • Sign In
  • Elevate 2026 Pencil Banner
    cancel
    Showing results for 
    Search instead for 
    Did you mean: 

    Buying a house with 401K

    judys3
    Level 7

    I have a customer that pulled 60k from 401k to purchase a house.  This is not their first home.  They were under the understanding they could pull the 60k and not be taxed.  Am I missing something?

    0 Cheers

    This discussion has been locked. New comments cannot be posted on this discussion anymore. Start a new discussion

    1 Best Answer

    Accepted Solutions
    IRonMaN
    Level 15

    You aren’t missing anything but they were.  It’s taxable


    Slava Ukraini!

    View solution in original post

    22 Comments 22
    IRonMaN
    Level 15

    You aren’t missing anything but they were.  It’s taxable


    Slava Ukraini!
    dkh
    Level 15

    Wouldn't have been taxable if they'd taken it out as a loan from the 401k

     

    judys3
    Level 7

    If it was a first time home? 

    0 Cheers
    IRonMaN
    Level 15

    Still taxable 


    Slava Ukraini!
    dkh
    Level 15

    If the employer plan allows loans against the 401k - I believe they can use it for whatever they choose. It has to be a loan  not a withdrawal.   Employee is required to make payments on amount borrowed.

    Edit:   client wouldn't have received 1099-R if it was a loan 

    judys3
    Level 7

    This was not a loan it was a direct withdrawal.  I knew loans were not taxable and I would only have a form if they left employment.  This is a direct withdrawal from 401K and only paid 10% in taxes. They will be sorely disappointed.

    0 Cheers
    Just-Lisa-Now-
    Level 15
    Level 15

    If theyd rolled it to an IRA, then taken it from the IRA, they could have waived the penalty on the first 10K, but that's the only break they woould have gotten....no break on the penalty when its from a 401k.


    ♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥Lisa♥¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪
    dkh
    Level 15

    Well now they know they should've consulted you about the taxability of the withdrawal. 

    Who did they get the bad advice from ?    

    judys3
    Level 7

    Maybe Google.  

    rcooley25
    Level 11

    Even if it is a loan if the employee leaves the company before it is paid off then they have taxable income because at that time it is considered a distribution and not a loan.

    dkh
    Level 15

    Wouldn't have gotten $10k break from the IRA - it wasn't first time home purchase

    IRonMaN
    Level 15

    Did Google also say Intuit was giving away free Fireball today?  Why else would our good friend @rcooley25  pay us a visit? 😜


    Slava Ukraini!
    dkh
    Level 15

    Agree with that statement @rcooley25         sounds like in this case the client could've saved tax and penalties if they had taken a 401k loan instead of distribution      Expensive lesson for them

    TaxGuyBill
    Level 15

    @judys3 wrote:

     from 401k to purchase a house ... They were under the understanding they could pull the 60k and not be taxed. 


     

    Some taxpayers misunderstand what a "hardship withdrawal" means.  In most cases, a taxpayer can't withdraw from their 401(k) through their employer unless it is a "hardship withdrawal".  Purchasing a principal residence qualifies as a "hardship withdrawal", which allows the taxpayer to withdraw money.

    But they misunderstand that a "hardship withdrawal" does not change the fact it is taxable and potentially subject to the 10% penalty.

    rcooley25
    Level 11

    And I will be very happyt to share it with all of you.

    rcooley25
    Level 11

    Another piece of information to share with you. Today should be my 20th birthday. But my mother did not give birth to me for over 12 hours more so tommorrow (03/01/24) I turn 80.

    IRonMaN
    Level 15

    May I be the first here to wish you a happy birthday!!!!!!

    As far as birthdays go, out of our graduating class of 120+ kids I only remember my own birthday and one class member.  In 1972 our  February school newspaper listed the kids having birthdays for the month of February.  They also mentioned a classmate named Leonard by pointing out that he wasn't getting a birthday that year.  So while I am at it - Happy birthday Leonard F.!


    Slava Ukraini!
    TaxGuyBill
    Level 15

    Several years ago, we took somebody out to go "bar hopping" to celebrate her 21st birthday.  But she was born on February 29th, so she was actually 84 years old.  😀

    Terry53029
    Level 15
    Level 15

    Just a note on what the IRS considers " first time " If you haven't bought a home in last two years the IRS considers it first time.

    0 Cheers
    dkh
    Level 15

    @Terry53029    it's has not "owned"       there is a difference between owned and bought

     

    Terry53029
    Level 15
    Level 15

    @dkh The actual meaning is in IRS Code  72(t)(2)(F) and the meaning of first time home buyer in that code is "Qualified first-time homebuyer distributions For purposes of paragraph (2)(F)— (A) In general The term “qualified first-time homebuyer distribution” means any payment or distribution received by an individual to the extent such payment or distribution is used by the individual before the close of the 120th day after the day on which such payment or distribution is received to pay qualified acquisition costs with respect to a principal residence"

    0 Cheers
    dkh
    Level 15

    That's not the definition of "Qualified first-time homebuyer" .   That's the definition of Qualified first-time homebuyer distributions that qualify for penalty waiver 

    Q. Who is considered to be a first-time homebuyer?

    A. Taxpayers who have not owned another principal residence at any time during the three years prior to the date of purchase are considered first-time homebuyers.

     

    0 Cheers