After checking with the Credit Union in which the deposit was placed, the Branch Manager said all of the information (name, address, social security number) is of no concern because if the taxpayer wants to place the money in another account, they have the right to do so. It has been over a year now and it has been very frustrating to try to get the over $1600 returned by either the Credit Union or the person's name who we could sue over....
Best Answer Click here
This discussion has been locked. No new contributions can be made. You may start a new discussion here
That happened to me once awhile back. I had my client threaten the bank with an attorney and 10 minutes later the bank put the refund in her account.
IRS wont do anything as its not their problem but the bank (imo) should be held accountable as the check DOES NOT match the account holders name. The check should've been bounced back to IRS. BS answer they provided.
That happened to me once awhile back. I had my client threaten the bank with an attorney and 10 minutes later the bank put the refund in her account.
IRS wont do anything as its not their problem but the bank (imo) should be held accountable as the check DOES NOT match the account holders name. The check should've been bounced back to IRS. BS answer they provided.
How'd the wrong number get entered?
KP error on your part - I'd contact my E&O insurance carrier, ASAP.
Client gave you the wrong number - don't let the client's mistake become your problem.
It's my understanding that the bank is not supposed to allow the funds to go to a Non-account owner (mismatch of SSN) per the rules that are supposed to prevent funding of terrorism via bank account activities like that. I would think that this would be a great lever in getting the funds to the rightful party.
I would write a letter to the Credit Union describing that despite all evidence that shows otherwise, which you brough to their attention on more than one occasion, they seem to leave funds on deposit, which do not belong to this other person. They seem satisfied that is should be considered a legitimate deposit to their account, which you feel does not meet their requirements under the Patriot Act to hold the financial institution responsible that money is not being placed in accounts without proof of identification for the funds sent to the receiver, since that bypasses their responsibility to avoid or prevent money laundering or support of terrorism. You have done your best to bring to their attention that the wrong party has these funds, which makes it available to an unintended party to do whatever they want with the funds, and that you certainly can bring up the lack of identity confirmation and their lack of cooperation, to the IRS, when the funds are in fact a Federal Payment from the IRS payment directly to the party holding the funds in error and clearly meant for your client, that actual tax payer. You can make it clear the IRS can be brought in to examine the banking flow.
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.