This is not an area with which I have any experience or exposure, but I really thought I remembered, from CPE classes of days long past, and sources which I can no longer recall, or locate, that the recurring advice was, "Don't put Real Estate into an LLC!".
But now I find myself in a situation where someone is asking my advice on the subject and, the little voice in the back of my head keeps saying, "Don't put Real Estate into an LLC!", but I don't know why not, and every resource that's come up when I've attempted to research the topic, seems to scream, "DO IT!!!"
So, I'm looking for a little wisdom of the collective. Is there a downside to holding Real Estate in an LLC?
Or even better, Short of telling me it's because I'm losing my mind, Does anyone have any thoughts about what it is that's trapped back there in my grey matter, possibly slightly scrambled, that's making me think I remember, "Don't put Real Estate into an LLC!"? Am I confusing LLCs with something else? Or is it possible that that used to be the rule, based on circumstances at the time, and now things are different, and LLCs are a good vehicle?
Best Answer Click here
This discussion has been locked. No new contributions can be made. You may start a new discussion here
You *don't* put appreciating assets into a Corp (especially a "C") because removing the asset is a taxable transaction, unlike with a LLC and/or partnership.
Plus, with a C - there's the double taxation issue.
LLC's are generally the advised vehicle for real estate investments because of the limited liability component. But, as Bill points out, if the LLC isn't handled/treated/managed as a separate entity that liability protection can easily be pierced.
You *don't* put appreciating assets into a Corp (especially a "C") because removing the asset is a taxable transaction, unlike with a LLC and/or partnership.
Plus, with a C - there's the double taxation issue.
LLC's are generally the advised vehicle for real estate investments because of the limited liability component. But, as Bill points out, if the LLC isn't handled/treated/managed as a separate entity that liability protection can easily be pierced.
The general saying is never put real estate into a corporation (especially a C-corporation). But there is generally nothing wrong with putting it into a LLC.
However, if you live in State that charges an annual fee for an LLC (such as California's $800 minimum fee), then using a LLC may not be a great idea (especially a Single Member LLC). A good insurance policy may be a better investment.
Also, most taxpayers don't treat a Single Member LLC as a separate entity and tend to mix personal and business together. That very often will void the liability limitations of a LLC (that varies by State), in which case putting it into a LLC was just a waste of time and money. In other words, the taxpayer needs to know WHY and HOW a LLC can be beneficial, and treat it accordingly. There are countless people that form a LLC just because somebody told them to, and they have NO IDEA why or how to handle it. If a person does that, the I agree, don't put it in a LLC as it won't benefit them.
In Tennessee and some other states, LLCs pay a Franchise Tax (based on the higher of Net Worth or Fixed Assets/Inventories/Real Property Rentals), so putting those real estate holdings in the LLC increases the Franchise Tax on the LLC...has no impact on the Excise(Income) Tax normally.
You don't put property into a corporation that you will manage for purposes of rental income, because corporations require payroll. Otherwise, at least in MT, we always put property, other than personal residences, into an LLC; even RVs. For instance, you might bundle your residential rentals into different LLCs up to some value held in each LLC, such as $1m or $5m, as a segregation concept.
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.