Best Answer Click here
This discussion has been locked. No new contributions can be made. You may start a new discussion here
I have seen a situation where the difference is material, where a 3115 was filed to correct the Cost Basis, and to calculate the depreciation which should have been taken.
The Depreciation difference (Under or Over reported...sounds like under in this case) was then reported as an expense in the year of the correction as a current expense. (in the case I saw, it was the year before the sale).,
The Sale was then reported as if everything had been done correctly from the start. I have no experience as to the final outcome, as this was a recent filing.
I have seen a situation where the difference is material, where a 3115 was filed to correct the Cost Basis, and to calculate the depreciation which should have been taken.
The Depreciation difference (Under or Over reported...sounds like under in this case) was then reported as an expense in the year of the correction as a current expense. (in the case I saw, it was the year before the sale).,
The Sale was then reported as if everything had been done correctly from the start. I have no experience as to the final outcome, as this was a recent filing.
Could the cost basis difference be an allocation for the land ?
Thank you!
And a 3115 also?
@dianejhart wrote:
And a 3115 also?
If it was strictly using an incorrect Basis, no, form 3115 does not come into play.
If it was something like land being depreciated, not depreciating improvements, or some other incorrect method, that is when Form 3115 applies.
Which section of form 3115 is used to correct an error for the cost basis of land?
For cost basis of LAND - (which should not include any incorrect prior year tax effects)
I would just correct the basis. I don't think a 3115 would be required, as there was no change in accounting method - merely correction of an error with no prior tax effect.
Which form do you recommend using to correct just the land basis, having no effect to prior years?
@GPBurdell - Did this under/overstatement of land value also impacted value used for any related depreciable improvements?
If it's an individual return, just change it in your records.
1065 or other business return it would be an "other adjustment" in the equity reconciliation section. (don't have a form in front of me so I can't give you a section / line number.
The land's original basis was allocated due to the intention to subdivide the land into 4 lots. Due to unforeseen circumstances, that never took place and the property is now being sold as one parcel. Expenses on the entire parcel had been taken for the entirety of the rental period due to the land never officially being subdivided. Expenses being only property taxes, which are minor at best for the unused portion of the land.
Any improvements made to the land were only to the portion where the building went in. So no the understatement did not impact the value used for related depreciable improvements.
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.