I have clients who are a married couple and a MFS/MFJ comparison shows a $453 higher refund overall married filing separately.
It is only due to the fact that the spouse will receive a much higher recovery rebate credit by filing MFS.
Is this a glitch in the program or will the IRS allow us to use a different filing status than the year of the initial stimulus payment in order to maximize the recovery rebate?
Thanks for any replies.
This discussion has been locked. No new contributions can be made. You may start a new discussion here
This is moot: "than the year of the initial stimulus payment"
The "year of the stimulus" is 2020.
Perhaps it would help to review what is really happening:
The funds were paid out as Advanced payment against a projection. The projection used 2018 or 2019 tax returns. But 2020 is the Actuals. You use the 2020 return to reconcile what a person is entitled to, against what they got.
If the person is not a dependent in 2020, then they would be entitled to the payment/credit as individual filers. That doesn't mean "not being claimed." It means "no longer qualifies as a dependent."
You might want to bookmark these links and read the IRS guidance.
Interactive wizards portal for determining dependency:
https://www.irs.gov/help/ita
And:
https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/economic-impact-payment-information-center-topic-a-eip-eligibility
https://www.irs.gov/coronavirus/second-eip-faqs#Eligibility
One for each EIP.
Have you entered 1/2 of the EIP they already received under each spouse?
Depending on the numbers, your result is theoretically possible.
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, I did.
But I did wonder if that made sense. Since the husband is a higher earner and wouldn't have received any stimulus had they filed separately in 2019.
Thanks for the reply.
I did check out the IRS FAQs on this but did not see anything that specifically addresses having a different filing status in 2020 than 2019. Since the advance payment was based on a filing status, I assume it must be taken into account.
EIP was an advance. The 2020 return computes the actual allowed amount after EIP.
Thank you.
This may be a year where many more MFS returns are filed than usual.
"Since the advance payment was based on a filing status"
Of a Previous year. That is moot, now.
"MFS returns are filed than usual"
There are other analysis points that weigh on this, though. The EIP alone is not a reason to file separately, if you realize something else is being forfeited or given up.
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.