Welcome back! Ask questions, get answers, and join our large community of tax professionals.
  • Sign In
  • Elevate 2026 Pencil Banner
    cancel
    Showing results for 
    Search instead for 
    Did you mean: 

    Stimulus Check | Eligibility

    Gsouls
    Level 3

    Will H1B holder who filed MFJ qualify for the stimulus check? The spouse and all the dependent children have ITIN. I have researched IRS website to see if I can find any information, but I did not. Does anyone has any reliable information on this scenario to share. 

    Is there any IRS rule which can disqualify the taxpayer?

    I would appreciate it if you can add your source to the answer.

    Thank you for your answers.

    0 Cheers

    This discussion has been locked. New comments cannot be posted on this discussion anymore. Start a new discussion

    9 Comments 9
    itonewbie
    Level 15

    The current interpretation, which is being challenged in court, is that both spouses filing MFJ, along with their qualifying children, must all have valid SSNs that are authored for employment.

    This means your client will only qualify if he files MFS without claiming his dependent children, which is not worth the EIP.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Still an AllStar
    itonewbie
    Level 15

    See §6428(g).

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Still an AllStar
    Gsouls
    Level 3

    Thank you for your quick response. The client has already filed. Can he file an amended return to change the filing status?

    Thank you.

    0 Cheers
    BobKamman
    Level 15

    We don't know if the children are "qualifying" -- they could be 17 or older.  They could qualify him, though, for Head of Household status.  It might not make that much difference in tax, between MFJ and HH.  And there's no restriction on filing an amended return, MFJ, after the EIP has been collected.  

    "$1,200 not worth it" is a value judgment -- it's the proposed cost of a citizenship application.  Of course a green card is needed first, and that costs even more.  We don't know if the taxpayer is paying fees to a high-dollar tax pro, or getting pro bono help from someone who wants him to stay here because he's working on a new vaccine.  

    itonewbie
    Level 15

    HoH will require the spouse to be an NRA.  Could be an idea if that fits the taxpayer's circumstances.

    In my experience, a majority of green card applications for employment visa holders are sponsored by employers, even though there may be conditions for bonds or retention.  Whether they filed MFS, MFJ, or HoH in certain years have not been a material concern with these applications so long as its within the law, AFAIK.

    Potential problems tend to arise after they receive their green cards when it comes to taking certain positions on their returns for §911 and treaty benefits.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Still an AllStar
    Gsouls
    Level 3

    Thank you s much for the comments. From the two comments that have been posted, my understanding now is that it is not worth the effort, time and potential problems down the line to amend filing status to HoH for $1200. 

    Thank you for your contributions. Much appreciated.

    0 Cheers
    Gsouls
    Level 3

    This section (§6428(g)) you posted is super helpful. I now clearly understand why the client does not qualify. Much Appreciated.

    0 Cheers
    qbteachmt
    Level 15

    Interesting observation: "And there's no restriction on filing an amended return, MFJ, after the EIP has been collected."

    On the other hand, why not file MFS/HoH in 2020 to get that amount as a refundable credit in the reconciliation step, and avoid all the shenanigans of filing-amending-amending.

    *******************************
    Don't yell at us; we're volunteers
    BobKamman
    Level 15

    @qbteachmt 

    And maybe by the time 2020 returns are due, Congress will have made some technical corrections to the CAREless Act showing it did not intend to make second-class citizens out of Americans who married foreigners.  (After all, our President has done it twice.)  

    Unless, of course, they are dead.  The taxpayers, I mean, not Congress.