Welcome back! Ask questions, get answers, and join our large community of tax professionals.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Is anyone else out ther ready to start a revolt regarding these micro W-2's that are being sent out.

Gotaxes
Level 3
I don't know this on authority but I feel that the IRS has approved these companies "saving money" by printing these terrible W-2's that are out there. Even wearing glasses, I can't read these W-2's anymore. Over 40 years in this business and the W-2's are almost unreadable. Even big companies are sending out these W'2's. I don't know that they care as I am sure it's "cost saving" but I feel it is a disservice to the working employee as I am sure there are a lot of mistakes in not being able to read the numbers properly. Anyone else out there having any issues with this???
11 Comments 11
Just-Lisa-Now-
Level 15
Level 15

every once in a awhile I get one with super tiny numbers, I toss 'em in the copy machine at 150% enlargement  LOL


♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥Lisa♥¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪
Gotaxes
Level 3

Hi Lisa,

Maybe it's the part of our country that I am working in but this is very, very common these days.

 

IRonMaN
Level 15

How many are mailed that way vs being provided electronically?  You have to remember everything tax wise is being generated in terms of DIYers who download everything into the software or take a picture of it.


Slava Ukraini!
Gotaxes
Level 3

Actually, at least so far in my experience, the ones that have been downloaded and printed have been far better than the ones being sent in the mail from the companies. The print is larger and much more legible. One in particular - and not by any means the worse of the bunch - is one of the "Big 3."
"

Gotaxes
Level 3

Sorry - by that I mean the ones that have been mailed out by one of the "Big 3."

BobKamman
Level 15

The big companies are using the big payroll service providers. I don't think the print is any smaller than it was 50 years ago.  The programmers back then were 25 years old with perfect vision, and the programmers today are 25 years old with perfect vision.  Meanwhile, our eyes have changed.  

It doesn't help that IRS requires much more information on a W-2 than it did back in the last century.  I have one client who works for a major discount broker.  They can't get all the codes in Box 12 (C, W, D, DD, etc.) so they actually give him 2 W-2s, with one just for the spillover.  

rcooley25
Level 11

I am glad others have had this problem. I was beginning to think it was only me.

IRonMaN
Level 15

The numbers were getting harder and harder for me to read last year ......................... and then I had cataract surgery and the numbers don't seem to be a problem anymore.


Slava Ukraini!
BobKamman
Level 15

The numbers were easy for me to read before I had cataract surgery.  Now I use reading glasses for close-up work, which is a minor nuisance now that I'm not also wearing a mask.  For the first time in my life, though, I can drive without glasses.  I could have spent a few thousand more for the upgraded lenses that may or may not work for close-up vision, but with no guarantees and a doubtful useful life, I went with the glasses option.  But now my favorite reading glasses are no longer available on Amazon, and one of the nose pads has fallen off.  I have the spare parts and tools to replace it, but unlike earlier occasions it is offering extreme resistance.  

PATAX
Level 15

Thank you - yes - I thought my pop bottles were getting weak. the print is too small.

itonewbie
Level 15

Back in the days when fax was common, W-2's were not any easier to read with those low resolution scans that came out just as fuzzy on the receiving end.  After a while, you get pretty good at making out those subtle differences between 5 and 6, 6 and 8, etc.

With the advance of technology, it's much easier to improve the legibility of poor photos and scans.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Still an AllStar