sharonvolotko
Level 1
12-07-2019
05:24 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The property was not rented. Client lived there for 1.75 year.
Best Answer Click here
Labels
This discussion has been locked. No new contributions can be made. You may start a new discussion here
1 Best Answer
Accepted Solutions
abctax55
Level 15
4 Comments 4
abctax55
Level 15
12-07-2019
05:25 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
NO
(I'm going with the succinct answer)
HumanKind... Be Both
Just-Lisa-Now-
Level 15
12-07-2019
05:25 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You cant just call something a business...what was the property used for?
♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥Lisa♥¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪
IRonMaN
Level 15
12-07-2019
05:25 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sounds like they just lived in it, but too short of a period to get the exclusion.
Slava Ukraini!
Slava Ukraini!
Just-Lisa-Now-
Level 15
12-07-2019
05:25 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
you'd only need an exclusion if there was a profit...looks like someone is trying to get some losses? this post makes little sense.
♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥Lisa♥¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪
♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥Lisa♥¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪