Yes, facts acknowledged. And your question is?
correct
Correct... If you have a question, please tell us what you want to find out.
Can I file 1st quarter residency in KY because taxpayer resided with family, and didn't have an apartment in CA. DL and auto tags would have been CA.
2nd Qtr taxpayer moved to WA with apartment, DL, auto tags - with intent of living there permanently.
But then decided to move in with friends in CA, so moved back to CA, but had to continue to pay WA apartment lease until it ended. Kept DL and auto tags in WA.
He's still living in CA.
If taxpayer paid 100% taxes to CA but did not reside in CA 365 days he's owed a refund. I am trying to correctly allocate days out of CA, but am unsure of how strict CA calculates their days.
Don't confuse Residency and Withholding as if that drives taxes. A lot of States also have Source rules, now. Search the web to find what applies, such as:
Google: ca remote worker taxes
wa remote worker taxes
etc.
Plenty of employers are withholding what doesn't apply. Partly, your taxpayer would be to blame, for not updating the employer, if there truly was a change in residency.
"Staying with family" is not a change of residency, by definition.
Thanks for the resources.
@SherM wrote:
2nd Qtr taxpayer moved to WA with apartment, DL, auto tags - with intent of living there permanently.
But then decided to move in with friends in CA, so moved back to CA, but had to continue to pay WA apartment lease until it ended. Kept DL and auto tags in WA.
He's still living in CA.
You have to determine whether your client was a statutory or domiciliary resident of CA. Domicile is a matter of fact and intent. Abandonment of a domicile must be accompanied by the physical relocation to a new state as the permanent home, supported by other concrete actions to establish social, economic, and professional ties, and a definitive plan to leave the previous state. This is a common law concept, in which multiple factors are considered collectively for convergence and no one factor is necessarily given a larger weigh or determinative. This is much more than the few actions you cited, all of which could be easily manipulated.
The fact that your client moved from place to place gives the impression that he didn't have a domicile outside of CA to which he would return. The fact that he returned to CA after just a few months in WA also calls into question whether he had actually intended to permanently relocate to WA (not to say that it's not possible - just that you'd need stronger facts to support the changes in domicile within a short span). This is especially true if your client's role, based on the terms of his employment, is physically located in CA and the terms do not provide for telecommuting on a permanent basis.
Prima facie, your client would remain a full-year resident of CA and would claim a credit for NR taxes paid to KY for services rendered in KY. Since WA doesn't have any state income tax, your client will pay CA tax in full for services rendered in WA.
I was afraid CA would claim his income while in Washington. These kids became nomads during COVID. Now he wants to leave CA and move back home to KY. Thanks everyone for the help. This is definitely above my paygrade!
This should involve a deeper review of his circumstances and facts. State tax consultation should be a billable service.
Good point. There will be much tax planning before 2022 filing.
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.