This is my client's question: I'm currently in Iraq, I would meet the 330 days out of the country but needed to go back to the states to defend myself in court. The court adjourned twice, before awarding in my favor. However; it took 7 weeks. The only reason for returning to the states was the court case.
I left for Iraq December 20th, 2017 and I'm scheduled to return to the US November 30th.
Best Answer Click here
This discussion has been locked. No new contributions can be made. You may start a new discussion here
"I would meet the 330 days out of the country but needed to go back to the states to defend myself in court"
I saw your question also in the PTO FB group. My first question is whether you have qualified that statement. 330-day count (which btw, is based on any 12-month period instead of calendar year as your question seems to imply) is not the only criterion for §911. You need to review his underlying contract (e.g. long term assignment/employment, military contractors, rotational schedules, etc.) and other relevant facts and circumstances to establish not only his tax home but also his abode (which has been a point of contention in recent cases).
Unless the year in question is your client's first year overseas or he's a green card holder, assuming all the other conditions for §911 are met, you should use BFR instead.
[Edited: Your question was posted on the FB group instead of NAEA webboard]
"I would meet the 330 days out of the country but needed to go back to the states to defend myself in court"
I saw your question also in the PTO FB group. My first question is whether you have qualified that statement. 330-day count (which btw, is based on any 12-month period instead of calendar year as your question seems to imply) is not the only criterion for §911. You need to review his underlying contract (e.g. long term assignment/employment, military contractors, rotational schedules, etc.) and other relevant facts and circumstances to establish not only his tax home but also his abode (which has been a point of contention in recent cases).
Unless the year in question is your client's first year overseas or he's a green card holder, assuming all the other conditions for §911 are met, you should use BFR instead.
[Edited: Your question was posted on the FB group instead of NAEA webboard]
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.