Welcome back! Ask questions, get answers, and join our large community of tax professionals.
- Topics
- Training
- Community
- Product Help
- Industry Discussions
- User Groups
- Discover
- Resources
View this page to find answers to common questions on estimated tax payments. See here for more info.
View this page to find answers to common questions on estimated tax payments. See here for more info.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Intuit Accountants Community
- :
- Lacerte Tax
- :
- Lacerte Tax Discussions
- :
- IRS is reducing the Additional Child Tax Credit citing the Premium Tax Credit repayment
IRS is reducing the Additional Child Tax Credit citing the Premium Tax Credit repayment
Options
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
CJ058
Level 1
07-31-2024
01:22 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
IRS software possible difference with Lacerte software calculations - Form 8812.
Received a CP11 reducing the Additional Child Tax Credit and applying the full Child Tax Credit to line 19 on the 1040, this is prior to applying the Residential Clean Energy Credit.
The Child Tax Credit Limitation Worksheets in Lacerte appear to be correct, allowing the Residential Clean Energy Credit to be applied first followed by the Child Tax Credit and then the Self Employment Tax and the Additional Child Tax Credit reduction. Speaking with two IRS Tax Pro Hotline agents, they said we needed to recalculate our 8812 but could not say what changes needed to be made.
A third agent felt the Premium Tax Credit was affecting the Child Tax Credit limitation for line 19. I can not find any support for this being the correct and Lacerte software has not shown this to be true. The client does have a PTC repayment on Schedule 2, but again the worksheets appear to be correct.
Has anyone else run into this or a similar miscalculation notice situation?
