Should Basis of solar asset for solar credit showing up in box 20 with code AH and in note on page 2 as if purchased in 2018 but was purchased in 2016?

[jimweinstein]

This appears to be incorrect and would cause a partner to take the solar credit a second time incorrectly.

[sjrcpa · Accepted solution]

Code AH is for 199A computations and has nothing to with the solar credit.

[jimweinstein]

Footnote reads exactly the same as when we purchased the asset just with a Code AH instead of Z.  Definitely could be misinterpreted as a new asset available for the solar credit because Sec. 199 is not referenced in the footnote at all.