TaxMonkey's Posts

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

TaxMonkey's Posts

S to C should be tax free. S or C to partnership has tax consequences as the assets are deemed sold at FMV, which would often be a gain if they are fully depreciated.  This would be complicated by ... See more...
S to C should be tax free. S or C to partnership has tax consequences as the assets are deemed sold at FMV, which would often be a gain if they are fully depreciated.  This would be complicated by any assumption of liabilities in the liquidation as well.
That would potentially be very risky, as both the buyer's and seller's tax returns should agree on the purchase price of the assets.  Not to mention, presumably some of the price is attributable to g... See more...
That would potentially be very risky, as both the buyer's and seller's tax returns should agree on the purchase price of the assets.  Not to mention, presumably some of the price is attributable to goodwill. Section 1245 property, in particular has tax ramifications, as tax on the depreciation recapture cannot be deferred in an installment sale, and is due immediately.  Furthermore, the buyer will want to depreciate the assets, and there should be agreement on their purchase price.
Allocating the purchase price among the assets is NOT something that you should be doing.  This is something that is negotiated during sale, between the buyer and the seller.  This information is als... See more...
Allocating the purchase price among the assets is NOT something that you should be doing.  This is something that is negotiated during sale, between the buyer and the seller.  This information is also reported on Form 8594 and should be included with the tax return. This is something you need to kick back to the taxpayer to solve.  The allocation of the sale price has tax consequences for both the buyer and the seller.
You can "trick" the software by creating one asset with the consolidated totals of the fixed assets - purchase price, depreciation, etc.  An then "sell" that asset, and simply delete all the other as... See more...
You can "trick" the software by creating one asset with the consolidated totals of the fixed assets - purchase price, depreciation, etc.  An then "sell" that asset, and simply delete all the other assets. Make sure to keep the type of property the same in a consolidated entry.  1245 property is treated differently in a sale than 1250 or 1231 property.
Yes, revoking an S election would make a business a C corp. Filing a partnership election would not change your requirement to liquidate the corporation, with the associated tax consequences.  The ... See more...
Yes, revoking an S election would make a business a C corp. Filing a partnership election would not change your requirement to liquidate the corporation, with the associated tax consequences.  The IRS would still be looking for a final corp tax return.  The may be circumstances were liquidating a C corp is preferable to liquidating an S corp, but I can't think of any off the top of my head.  
That makes perfect sense as far as the CA Secretary of State is concerned.  However, the IRS will consider this to be an S-corp liquidation.  They will expect a final S-corp tax return with all of th... See more...
That makes perfect sense as far as the CA Secretary of State is concerned.  However, the IRS will consider this to be an S-corp liquidation.  They will expect a final S-corp tax return with all of the assets and liabilities distributed out at FMV to the shareholders.
Very occasionally.  Thank you for thinking of me !
You cannot reorganize back into a partnership.  It would be a corporate liquidation, and given what you said regarding basis and debt there would likely be taxes due.
Yes, assuming the custodial parent signs Form 8332 allowing them to.
The fact that you client gave $400k, doesn't mean that it was spent on the property.  What if the property was $375k and the kid pocketed the rest.  Or conversely what if the kid kicked in $10k of hi... See more...
The fact that you client gave $400k, doesn't mean that it was spent on the property.  What if the property was $375k and the kid pocketed the rest.  Or conversely what if the kid kicked in $10k of his own money. The properties basis is the lower of current FMV or the original purchase price plus improvements less depreciation.
NVM, I see that you mean from software.  There may still be some changes; https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1040--dft.pdf
Yes, and attributed S-corp is still and S-corp owner and qualifies for SEHI.
There is no way to abate interest - it is mandated by statute.
Ill share this resource: https://www.cpajournal.com/2018/02/13/tax-office-workflow-resources/ and another recommendation https://www.huskeypracticemanager.com/ ... See more...
Ill share this resource: https://www.cpajournal.com/2018/02/13/tax-office-workflow-resources/ and another recommendation https://www.huskeypracticemanager.com/
Your question contains the answer. If they convert "mid year" then obviously there will be two part year returns.
Are you filing all 38 state tax returns?  In which case you will file 37 (maybe there are a few exceptions) schedule S, which report the income taxed by both the other state and by California.
Form 982 has nothing to do with 1099-A. A foreclosure or abandonment is a sale.  It is not cancellation of debt.  Often the two are related, but not always.
No credit if earned income is 0.
I recently encountered a CPA who thought that the partnership redemption should be reported in 9a, after an unproductive phone call with him, is sent him his K-1s back with copies of the Forms 8082 I... See more...
I recently encountered a CPA who thought that the partnership redemption should be reported in 9a, after an unproductive phone call with him, is sent him his K-1s back with copies of the Forms 8082 I filed with my clients tax returns.