Tax Law and News IRS Falling Down on the Job of Helping ID Theft Victims Read the Article Open Share Drawer Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Written by Alistair M. Nevius, J.D., Journal of Accountancy Modified Oct 17, 2017 2 min read During some of the busiest weeks of tax season, less than one caller in 10 to the IRS’s Taxpayer Protection Program phone line was able to reach IRS staff for assistance, according to Nina Olson, the national taxpayer advocate, in her midyear Objectives Report to Congress released on Wednesday. And the average time that callers had to wait to get through was as high as 60.2 minutes for the week of Feb. 7. Olson reported that the Taxpayer Protection Program (TPP) stopped more than 3.8 million suspicious tax returns during this year’s filing season; however, 34 percent of those suspended returns turned out to be legitimate. At the end of May, the IRS had 671,773 identity-theft cases in its open inventory, a 69 percent increase from May 2014. According to the report, stolen identity cases are the most common type of case that Olson’s Taxpayer Advocate Service deals with, which she attributes to the low level of service on the TPP phone lines and the high false positive rate for suspended returns. Olson called for a single point of contact in the IRS for victims of identity theft: “Victims of such a traumatic event should not be bounced around from one IRS function to another, recounting their experience time and again to various employees” (Objectives Rep’t to Cong., vol. 1, p. 31). She also thinks the IRS should develop a method to track and resolve identity-theft cases more quickly. The taxpayer advocate was also critical of the IRS’s goal of automating taxpayer service and issue resolution. Sending more taxpayers online to find answers ignores what taxpayer’s want, she said, and will increase taxpayers’ compliance costs. “[I]t is wishful thinking, if not foolhardy, to expect taxpayers to rely on computer-driven systems for resolution of tax problems that, if not resolved fully, could lead to devastating financial consequences” (Objectives Rep’t to Cong., vol. 1, p. 4). Previous Post How Sales Tax Nexus Confusion Affects Your Client’s Business Next Post Proper Hiring and Tax Withholding Guidelines for Domestic Employees Written by Alistair M. Nevius, J.D., Journal of Accountancy Alistair M. Nevius is the Journal of Accountacy’s editor-in-chief, tax. More from Alistair M. Nevius, J.D., Journal of Accountancy Comments are closed. Browse Related Articles Client Relationships Majority of CPAs Polled had Clients Victimized by Tax I… Tax Law and News National Taxpayer Advocate Reports to Congress Tax Law and News What your clients should do if they get an identity the… Client Relationships Help Your Clients Handle Identity Theft Tax Law and News IRS Offers Tax Preparers Tips Following a Data Theft Tax Law and News How Audits Are Conducted by the IRS Tax Law and News Practicing Before the IRS: What You Need to Know Tax Law and News Taxpayer advocate targets tax return preparers Practice Management IRS Reminds Professional Tax Preparers of Data Security… Tax Law and News IRS May Delay Returns Claiming EITC or ACTC