Client S corporation has a 2024 revenue of 400,000 and $200,000 of wage expense, which is paid to him. He has no other employees. He has a home (high mtg int and high RE taxes) and an office in that home. The prior CPA had the S corporation pay the owner rent for this office space. That means the S Corporation gets a rent deduction and the individual has rental income. And a $400 net investment income tax on his 2023 1040 results.
I think an accountable plan reimbursing the owner for home office costs would be better because no rental income would be reported.
A comparison for 2024 shows a $500 tax increase with the self-rental.
Any thoughts? Yawns of boredom? Huzzahs for something interesting?
The S Corp has no other office location. The person does no other work in this office.
Are both of these true?
@qbteachmt Do either of those matter?
The S Corp can reimburse the shareholder employee for the use of the home office. Doesn't have to be exclusive. They can negotiate among themselves.
They can't really negotiate among themselves. The point of An Accountable Plan is to show substantiation, not based on an allowance. A vague amount comes across as rental. "For the convenience of the employer" applies, and there might be another primary location; I was asking not to eliminate but to find out. It seems unlikely the S Corp would be audited to that level, but a kitchen table with the computer at one end isn't going to fly.
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.