Best Answer Click here
Thank you.
The only follow up question = It states that you MAY have to take back some or all of the depreciation aa ordinary income
This cash Client is filing jointly entitled to 500K exclusion - Gain is only 138K
Depreciation is 30K Gain with deprecation recapture is 130K which is less than the 500K
Gain to the extent of prior depreciation is taxable. Taxpayer got a tax benefit for it.
The rest of the gain is eligible for the exclusion, according to all the rules.
Have your client see page 14 "Recapturing Depreciation" in pub 523. It is not reducing capital gain exclusion. it is adding the depreciation to ordinary income
Thank you. I understand that aspect.
Actually i looking for source link - that describes the rules.
Client is looking at Publication 523 does not clearly describe the rules.
Also have found no reference on the IRS website that explains the rules
Thank you.
The only follow up question = It states that you MAY have to take back some or all of the depreciation aa ordinary income
This cash Client is filing jointly entitled to 500K exclusion - Gain is only 138K
Depreciation is 30K Gain with deprecation recapture is 130K which is less than the 500K
@John Van Horn The 121 exclusion is up to $500,000 of Capital gains for MFJ. Any time you claim deprecation you will have to reclaim as ordinary income
I'm just going on a rant now ... whoever revised Publication 523 a number of years back is a complete idiot.
It is NOT "recapture", it is "Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain".
It is NOT "ordinary income", it is "capital gain" that is taxed at ordinary rates, up to 25%.
/Rant off/
@John Van Horn wrote:
The only follow up question = It states that you MAY have to take back some or all of the depreciation aa ordinary income
If you have a loss you do not need to pick up the depreciation as income. That's where the "may" comes in.
@TaxGuyBill I agree with you, but I was only trying to get John to understand he has to pay tax on the deprecation
I'm sorry Terry, that wasn't aimed at you. You were just repeating what the OP and the Publication says.
It's the person at the IRS that I'm annoyed at. It's improved slightly over the last few years, but when they first revised Publication 523 it had SO many outright errors.
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.