Welcome back! Ask questions, get answers, and join our large community of tax professionals.
  • Sign In
  • Created with Sketch. We apologize for the inconvenience: Our community is currently in read-only mode while we perform essential maintenance. Some features may be temporarily unavailable. We’re working hard to restore full access as quickly as possible.
    cancel
    Showing results for 
    Search instead for 
    Did you mean: 

    Settlements from the PG&E fire

    PauerHaus1
    Level 1

    Several of my clients received settlements from the California PG&E Fire Victims Trust in 2022.

    I know that these settlements are normally taxable, but the California Legislature passed AB1249 and SB1246 to exclude the settlement money from gross income for California income tax purposes. I did read that bipartisan legislation (Thompson/LaMalfa) was introduced to exclude these settlements also from federal taxation. I can't find if this has this been resolved? I appreciate any advise on this issue regarding reporting or not reporting as income. Clients attorney told them if you don't get a 1099, it's not taxable, which is questionable? If reporting as income I understand that attorney's fees also should be included as income. Try to explain that!

    0 Cheers
    3 Comments 3
    qbteachmt
    Level 15

    "that attorney's fees also should be included as income. Try to explain that!"

    TCJA 2017, includes property claims or settlements:

    https://www.thebalancemoney.com/are-legal-fees-tax-deductible-5184580

     

    *******************************
    Don't yell at us; we're volunteers
    0 Cheers
    qbteachmt
    Level 15

    Thompson has a nice explanation with useful IRS links:

    https://mikethompson.house.gov/pgefvt

    For instance, "a settlement" is not the same as having lost their primary residence, which is in fact a provision for the IRS exception.

    *******************************
    Don't yell at us; we're volunteers
    0 Cheers
    BobKamman
    Level 15

    The bill was reintroduced last month with bipartisan sponsors, but nothing is going anywhere in this Congress.

    https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-lamalfa-huffman-mcclintock-reintrodu...

    To the extent that it involves property damage, wouldn't it reduce basis before being taxed, perhaps as capital gain?  Is Spidell covering this, now that they have washed the egg off their face from the MCTR confusion?