Folks:
My client has a series of short cover transactions on his 1099-B. For most of them, the cost and proceeds data looks normal: Cost of $5,000, proceeds of $6,000. I assumed that these were entered in Lacerte just like any other stock transaction. But one of the transactions shows proceeds of $6,000 but a cost of $70,000! I have not yet asked the client if that is correct, which I will do, but in the meantime this got me worrying that I was not entering the transaction correctly in Lacerte. Is there anything special to be done with it?
Thanks.
Micah
This discussion has been locked. No new contributions can be made. You may start a new discussion here
Talk with the client.
RE: But one of the transactions shows proceeds of $6,000 but a cost of $70,000!
Example: If you shorted 1,000 shares of GameStop Corp (GME) at $5 on around 7/1/2020, and covered on 3/1/2021, you could need $189,000 to cover. If you covered today, the bill would still be around $125,000. Based on GME's financials, using the traditional pricing models, shorting at $5 might not even be that bad an idea at that time.
Yes, as @George4Tacks suggested, ask the client - and brace for his/her pain, that is, unless the 1099-B was wrong. A suggestion: ask while the spouse is NOT there.
Actually if you identify the stock in issue, you may have a clue.
I once had a client (retired) that decided to trade in gold futures.
1st year - loss of $75K. I cringed a bit. He said - But it will recover!
2nd year - loss of $125K. A certain body part clinched a bit. He said - But it will recover!
3rd year - loss of $150K. I asked if he knew what a gambling addiction was and he responded with a description. I then said "Think about it."
He called the next day and thanked me for the thought I had passed on to him.
I never saw or heard from him again.
I never saw or heard from him again.
Most addicted to gambling know they have a problem and perhaps even regret every time they vow to quit. Your ex client had his moment of reckoning when he thanked you. Then he probably lost another $250K and decided not to face you. You tried to help him but instead helped yourself lose a client.
Perhaps he's now the fund manager for Fidelity's upcoming Crypto Retirement Fund.
@msindc1 You may also want to visit the angle of the Active Trader classification.
If your client qualified for the active trader status, all of his/her losses from trading become active, ordinary losses for tax purposes. This avoids the applicability of the $3000 capital loss deduction. Bear in mind there are applicable regulations and compliance implications.
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the Intuit Accountants Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the community and be taken to that site instead.