rbynaker
Level 13

I guess I shouldn't be, but I'm a bit shocked by how much conflicting information there is out there.  The rules changed then the rules got clarified then there were exceptions to the clarified rules.  AFAIK, since the death occurred before the SECURE Act was passed, we go back to the old rules.  For plain language, that's Pub 590-B from 2019:

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/p590b--2019.pdf

This IRS source gives conflicting information than what Terry posted.  I think the "new" information that Terry posted is incomplete and the rules in the old Pub 590 are correct.  I could be wrong but the SECURE Act specifically stated that the new rules only apply to deaths after 12/31/19.  This stuff makes my head spin, but the 590B info matches all of the old TaxBooks I could put my fingers on.

The first step though (as Terry pointed out), is what did the spouse choose to do with the inherited IRA?  If it's treated as her own then we can throw all of the inherited IRA rules out the window, it's just another one of her IRAs.  Job done.

If it's treated as an Inherited IRA then we're looking at page 9 of the PDF.  Thanks for including his age since that's highly relevant.  From the bottom of column 1 and into column 2:

Special rules for surviving spouse. If the owner died
before his or her required beginning date and the surviv-
ing spouse is the sole designated beneficiary, the follow-
ing rules apply.

Year of first required distribution. If the owner died
before the year in which he or she reached age 70 1/2, dis-
tributions to the spouse don't need to begin until the year
in which the owner would have reached age 70 1/2.

IMO there are no RMDs until at least 2037.

I've avoiding reading SECURE Act 2 until it actually passes both halves of Congress but I bet that will add even more fun.

Rick