WOW!!

My high school son is playing hooky today and saw me here giving @BobKamman  and @sjrcpa kudos for their comments. 

He asked we about Bob and this forum.  I was going over a concept for his economics class with him and we went off the tangent on Eminent Domain.

Anyway, I told him Bob is somewhere between all-knowing and know-it-all.  I learn from his all-knowingness and laugh at, off or with with his know-it-all crap.  (See my earlier post about him wetting his bed.)  

Along this line, let me fill in the gap for his post, because, here in this forum, as @IRonMaN  always jumps on my case, I'm the one capable of typing many many many lines and thus should be the designated fill-in-the-gappers, aka reading-between-the-liner.

I suspect, if Bob had my propensity of writing it all out, he would have written:

" To @1040shredder : @dkh 's comment, which you gracefully accepted as the solution, was based on dkh's experience with dkh's clients and the paperwork presented to dkh.   Therefore, @1040shredder , as you're shredding your clients' 1040's,  make sure to based on your experience with your clients and the paperwork presented to you.  As I always say, don't allow missing facts to get in the way of a good negligence penalty. I usually avoid saying it in public, though.  IRS might be listening. " 

To me, the words in this style were understood. (I don't know how to spell italicized.)

Bob's words are in bold. 

Now that I've burned another 3 to 15 minutes for everyone (Bob takes the low end of 3; he's a fast reader), do you all feel better now?

Billable work is calling.  Back to the salt mines.