TaxGuyBill
Level 15

@qbteachmt wrote:

. Having to report sale 2 as taxable is the better option.


 

No necessarily.  As I mentioned before, it seems like there is "Nonqualified Use", which means the exclusion is prorated.  Hypothetically, it is possible that house #1 has significantly more Nonqualified Use resulting less exclusion than house #2.

View solution in original post