- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
My client's S Corp now owns a Partnership involving other partners and their attnys and accountants.
I thought for sure that the SE tax on what is now the bulk of the income for the S Corp would somehow pass through to my clients, but now don't see where or how?
My client and his partners are not professionals (attny/lawyers/cpa's) if that matters, but wouldn't the ability to have an s corp own a partnership to avoid SE taxes be questionable?
Otherwise what partnership would structure any other way if this structure can eliminate SE taxes?.
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
"My client and his partners are not professionals (attny/lawyers/cpa's) if that matters, but wouldn't the ability to have an s corp own a partnership to avoid SE taxes be questionable?"
Everyone participating in the S Corp gets paid through payroll. Payroll covers Social Security and Medicare tax. SE is Social Security and Medicare tax. For SE, when you take the expense as a deduction (giving parity to an employer share), you will notice the math bases the tax on 92.35% and not the full 100% taxable income. For employees, the taxes are split evenly between employee and employer, and the employer's tax return is where the employer share is a deduction.
It's not avoidance. It's a different method for payment.
Don't yell at us; we're volunteers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I know and understand S Corps. That's primarily what I use for my clients.
The Partnerships I have in some cases own interests in other Partnerships.
The is the first time i've had an S Corp owning a Partnership and I just instinctively became worried about the SE taxes.
So you're saying it doesn't matter that most of the income comes from partnerships on their K-1, Box 14, Code A?
all the partnership self-employed income shown on the K-1 passes into the S Corp and then is just treated as ordinary income with no SE implications?