rbynaker
Level 14

The short answer is that the safe harbor defined in IRS Rev. Proc. 2019-13 expired when 100% bonus depreciation ended.  There's a KPMG article confirming this.  "The safe harbor method does not apply to a passenger automobile placed in service by the taxpayer after 2022"

So in 2023 with an 80% bonus depreciation you remove 80% of the basis of the asset to give to Section 168(k), that leaves 20% of the asset left to go through regular depreciation.  Under the "normal" rules the excess over the Section 280F limits only comes back after we fall off of the 6-year MACRS table.  RP-19-13 was extremely taxpayer friendly for as long as 100% bonus depreciation applied.  But now we're back to the law of unintended consequences.

My math looks something like this:

  Cost $37,000          
  Bonus 80% $29,600          
  Regular $7,400 Bonus Limit Lesser Of Excess Carry To
2023 20% $1,480 $29,600 $20,200 $20,200 $10,880 2029
2024 32% $2,368   $19,500 $2,368 $0  
2025 19.20% $1,421   $11,700 $1,421 $0  
2026 11.52% $852   $6,960 $852 $0  
2027 11.52% $852   $6,960 $852 $0  
2028 5.76% $426   $6,960 $426 $0  
2029 Excess $10,880   $6,960 $6,960 $3,920 2030
2030 Excess $3,920   $6,960 $3,920 $0  

 

Is that what you're seeing in Lacerte 2024?  My guess is the programmers didn't look beyond 12/31/23 for the 2023 software, then they had to correct it for 2024.

Rick

View solution in original post