- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The short answer is that the safe harbor defined in IRS Rev. Proc. 2019-13 expired when 100% bonus depreciation ended. There's a KPMG article confirming this. "The safe harbor method does not apply to a passenger automobile placed in service by the taxpayer after 2022"
So in 2023 with an 80% bonus depreciation you remove 80% of the basis of the asset to give to Section 168(k), that leaves 20% of the asset left to go through regular depreciation. Under the "normal" rules the excess over the Section 280F limits only comes back after we fall off of the 6-year MACRS table. RP-19-13 was extremely taxpayer friendly for as long as 100% bonus depreciation applied. But now we're back to the law of unintended consequences.
My math looks something like this:
Cost | $37,000 | ||||||
Bonus 80% | $29,600 | ||||||
Regular | $7,400 | Bonus | Limit | Lesser Of | Excess | Carry To | |
2023 | 20% | $1,480 | $29,600 | $20,200 | $20,200 | $10,880 | 2029 |
2024 | 32% | $2,368 | $19,500 | $2,368 | $0 | ||
2025 | 19.20% | $1,421 | $11,700 | $1,421 | $0 | ||
2026 | 11.52% | $852 | $6,960 | $852 | $0 | ||
2027 | 11.52% | $852 | $6,960 | $852 | $0 | ||
2028 | 5.76% | $426 | $6,960 | $426 | $0 | ||
2029 | Excess | $10,880 | $6,960 | $6,960 | $3,920 | 2030 | |
2030 | Excess | $3,920 | $6,960 | $3,920 | $0 |
Is that what you're seeing in Lacerte 2024? My guess is the programmers didn't look beyond 12/31/23 for the 2023 software, then they had to correct it for 2024.
Rick