PPE:

I just wanted you to know that I didn't make light of your client's problem.

Though I declared it was my "wild guess", those numbers were deduced based on the limited info. 

I first deduced that Client has only one qualifying dependent.  If it's more than 1, Stimulus Check II would tend to be higher, as more likely than not the 2019 AGI was used. 

Based on only one dependent, I figured Check I was lower than expected using the 2019 AGI.  Thus, I deduced Payment I was based on the 2018 AGI.  Thus that amount.

My "wild guess" for the RRC was based on similar approach, with the (now seemingly wrong) presumption that the info on the amount received for Check II was wrong. 

Anyway, the bit about bourbon was just for the lighter side.  For a long time I declined to declare publicly my choice of ardent spirits, until I found out it was same as John Wick's.   If that was his favorite, it'd be fine by me. 

I disguised my help as my "wild guess" hoping that you would give us more clues, without which I shall digress.

BTW, Joshua was the name of my dog when I set up this account (thus "barks at LCS).  I lost him shortly after that....  Boo  hoo, time for my regimen for today....

NOT Joshua, CPA